Thursday, August 26, 2010

Let's Debunk Some "Facts"

U.S. 2002 Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy...Image by tobo via Flickr
The following list is from thedailygreen.com. Under each point is my response.
  • Forests store 50% of the world's terrestrial carbon. (In other words, they are awfully important "carbon sinks" that hold onto pollution that would otherwise lead to global warming.)  
  • My response: This is an excellent point. Did you know that younger forests sequester more CO2 than older ones do? A well managed working forest, the kind that supplies the wood pulp for paper, is younger and has less CO2/methane producing rot than an older forest. If a forest is not a working one it is in more danger of being clear cut and turned into a paved over development.
  • Half the world's forests have already been cleared or burned, and 80% of what's left has been seriously degraded.  
  • My response: What is left out here is that most of that was for development and conversion to agricultural land. In the USA the number of acres of forest land has been quite stable and has actually grown over the last 10-15 years.
  • 42% of the industrial wood harvest is used to make paper.  
  • My response: Keep in mind that that this fact only applies to industrial wood harvest. This is how important that keeping the paper industry alive is. The best managed forests are the plantations used to make paper. The trees are replanted as opposed to conversion to agricultural or developmental purposes. Trees are a renewal resource. Keep them well managed!
  • The paper industry is the 4th largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions among United States manufacturing industries, and contributes 9% of the manufacturing sector's carbon emissions.  
  • My response: I am going to directly quote the Down to Earth website by International Paper here:
"paper: One of the great things about paper is that its primary raw materials are renewable. The paper and forest products industry replenishes more than it takes and ensures the sustainability of our forests by planting 1.7 million trees every single day, more than three times what is harvested. And the U.S. Dept. of Energy has stated that the carbon sequestered on forested lands in 2006 was greater than the carbon released from harvesting wood over the same period.
electronic: Making a computer typically requires the mining and refining of dozens of minerals and metals, including gold, silver and palladium, as well as the extensive use of plastics and hydrocarbon solvents. The lifespan of a computer is short, and electronics have become the fastest growing waste stream in the world."
  • Paper accounts for 25% of landfill waste (and one third of municipal landfill waste).  
  • My response: See above and hey at least paper is compostable.
    • Municipal landfills account for one third of human-related methane emissions (and methane is 23-times more potent a greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide).  
    • My response: Wait a second there. Doesn't that methane come from food waste and human waste (baby diapers folks).
      • If the United States cut office paper use by just 10% it would prevent the emission of 1.6 million tons of greenhouse gases -- the equivalent of taking 280,000 cars off the road. 
      • My response: And then you have produce the electricity to drive all of those electronic devices that would take their place. I don't think this analysis was done to completion.
        • Compared to using virgin wood, paper made with 100% recycled content uses 44% less energy, produces 38% less greenhouse gas emissions, 41% less particulate emissions, 50% less wastewater, 49% less solid waste and -- of course -- 100% less wood. 
        • response: My only comment here is that we need to use the recycled fiber appropriately. Tissue and toweling is much more appropriate than high end coated paper production.
          • In 2003, only 48.3% of office paper was recovered for recycling.
            • Recovered paper accounts for 37% of the U.S. pulp supply.
              • Printing and writing papers use the least amount of recycled content -- just 6%. Tissues use the most, at 45%, and newsprint is not far behind, at 32%.  
              • My response: That is appropriate. Cleaning up the recycle content is expensive and inappropriate for coated paper production. Use it in the production of newsprint, tissue and toweling.
                • Demand for recycled paper will exceed supply by 1.5 million tons of recycled pulp per year within 10 years.
                  • While the paper industry invests in new recycled newsprint and paper packaging plants in the developing world, almost none of the new printing and writing paper mills use recycled content.  
                  • My response: there is a reason for this. It is expensive to process the fiber for coated papers. The production of coated paper is lower than those other market segments anyway. 
                  • China, India and the rest of Asia are the fastest growing per-capita users of paper, but they still rank far behind Eastern Europe and Latin America (about 100 pounds per person per year),
                    Australia (about 300 pounds per person per year) and Western Europe
                    (more than 400 pounds per person per year).
                  • The Forest Stewardship Council's certification of sustainable forestry practices is growing, with 50% of the paper product market share and 226 million acres
                    accounted for. Advocates say the demand for recycled paper and
                    sustainably harvested pulp from consumers, advertisers, magazine makers
                    and other users of paper will yield the fastest reforms of the industry.  
                  • My response: Yes and this is happening at a rapid rate.




                  Enhanced by Zemanta

                  Monday, August 23, 2010

                  Hey Look at That! A Forward Thinking Paper Company

                  Mobile PhoneImage by johnmuk via Flickr
                  I would like to applaud Verso Paper Corp. on launching a mobile version of their corporate site. It is heartwarming to see a paper company be forward thinking in how they interact with their customers and other stakeholders.

                  This new version provides a simple and fast interface to to their product specifications, sales contact information and investor information.

                  Enhanced by Zemanta

                  Sunday, August 22, 2010

                  Down to Earth

                  A stack of manila paper.Image via Wikipedia
                  Is that email worth printing? Are pixels really greener than paper? If these types of questions are on your mind, actually I suggest that they should be, then I have a website to recommend to you. This was put together by the folks at International Paper. It is fact based and delves quite nicely into the economic issues of a working forest. For instance did you know that the production of paper can lead to more trees? If private landowners can't make money as tree farmers then what are they to do? Likely that land would be sold for development. I would say the biggest boon to tree preservation is probably the slowing of the new home starts.

                  When forests are working ones then the trees that are harvested are replaced. How many trees are replaced when a new development that clear cuts replaces a working forest?

                  Here is the link. I highly recommend you go there!

                  Click Here to Visit Down to Earth


                  Enhanced by Zemanta

                  Friday, August 20, 2010

                  eBooks and Paper

                  A Picture of a eBookImage via Wikipedia
                  Exactly how will eBooks affect paper usage? There have been many emotional as well as factual responses to this question for several years now. The latest eBook technology is actually quite interesting. The hardest thing about electronic reading had been eye strain. Reading on a backlit screen, even the very cool iPad, will tire your eyes and cause some strain. That is one of the reasons why many people prefer to read printed books. eReaders solve that issue in that it takes some type of external lighting to read the screen just like print. The current readers are all monochrome and are best for reading books. Not very good yet for reading magazines, comic books and such.

                  I actually own a Nook. My bride gave it to me for father's day. I have to say that my reading rate has gone up because of it. Maybe it is the novelty of it, but it is true nonetheless. The cost of a book is reduced so I have less of a monetary hurdle to acquiring books. The Nook does not seem to strain my eyes. Carrying my library is now extremely possible. You can truly get thousands of books into one of those devices. It has WiFi and 3G connectivity at no charge so downloading new books is easy. And there are plenty of free book offers as well to help add to your library.

                  How does this affect paper? The first obvious affect will be on book grades of paper. If I were a college student again I wouldn't buy paper based text books. I would save my back and my pocket book depletion rate that is for sure. If the quality improves, as in color displays, that animate well under external lighting then magazines will start to get hit. Books, magazine and printed comics will be left to just the collectors I think.

                  This all does not bode well for my future as I am paid to make paper better. How do I do that and compete with these new communication devices?

                  Enhanced by Zemanta

                  TAPPI Coating and Graphic Arts Division Issues Call for Papers

                  Papercon Coating Call for Papers

                  The deadline to submit an abstract is September 17th. Click the link for details.